Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Use your display name or email address to sign in:
Adding them in for selection can be done at the bottom of the post in the control def section
With the cycle time, you can't with that kind of addition,
You've created what is essentially a point path with parameters you set in place.
there is nothing for Mastercam to calculate for cycle time
Yup,
The Core toolpaths are all designed to cut from outside to to inside
Area paths are Inside boundary toolpaths
A rudimentary description though it is
You may need to create some wireframe/edge curves on a different level then turn off the level with the solid/surfaces
In the options on importing, there is an option to create wireframe/edges when imports
Anything truly parametric in nature, I will always write macros to accomplish.
In Mastercam, the geometry isn't parametric, so you end up modifying and manipulating the geometry.
in MC4SW, you can edit the parametric geometry, regenerate the part.
Change recognition IS what you want.
Call your reseller if you're not sure how it works, it's typically a "little" more step by step involved to go into here without writing a 3 page narrative on how exactly everything in there works.
If I remember correctly, there is a sample file that you can use
I've been down this road.
I would not do it.
I mean really, a company can't afford the hardware to make money with?
If it's a home system and you want to mess with, hey, go for it but a company, doesn't need to mess with that, they want systems that run, period, The warranty will handle the rest.
My 2 cents is free
If you have a nice big fat assembly file or something with 30 or 40,000 surfaces
That's where you'll REALLY notice what the card does for you
AFAIK, there aren't any "readily" available sample files for things like that...
And just exactly do what do you expect a video card to do for Mastercam processing performance?
Outside side of much cleaner graphics, better video response time and more stable verify, I'm not sure how you expect to "quantify" your results based on processing a Mastercam file
Having used both and ATi, they are better
Just better overall performance.
As far as geometry looking god or bad, crap geometry will still look like crappy geometry, no video card will fix that.
Always run at the highest available resolution for the greatest "look" do remember though, it is only a look
The 600 is an entry level card, the 2000 is a "good" mid-range card
Always avoid the NVS series
http://www.nvidia.com/object/workstation-solutions.html
The first and easist thing to try is
changing the
pbld, n$, t$, "M6", e$
to
pbld, n$, !t$, "M6", e$
The ! in front of the t should just update the variable
Space Pilot Pro
I started out with a Space Ball in NX2 and MCAM V9, I found the entire WCS could be ripped apart by the Spaceball if you didn't simply click in the screen once to give control back to MCAM. Once I understood that I have never in the past 10 years been without one, nor would work without one.
They're not difficult to describe but the actual usage comes so naturally that after a month you'll swear you'll never work without one again.,
Hotkeys are passe'
eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.
Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.