Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Use your display name or email address to sign in:
I've been using the Starrett for the past 11 years with zero issues, but I'm told to pick a new one so I'm torn between the Starrett and the Interapid. Does the Interapid require less stylus pressure? Especially for dialing in spindle probes? Is the Interapid stem removable?
TIA
Hey Guys, I've been threadmilling a lot of parts and in my thread data printouts I have a wire size, say Ø.036 and a MOW of 4.3984 to 4.3925. Since my wires are the "gauge", would it be better to stay in the mean of the range, away from the "no-go" low end?
I do a higbee on the mill all the time in 4-16 threads as well as 10tpi Buttress. I draw a single helix and dynamically rotate it to align the start with the threadmill start point.
Thanks Reko, Ijust saw that .05 in Y, that would've sucked. In regards tot he outputted cod I have my Z set at COR so I could work with 1 offset. Looks like I programmed it wrong and have to go back and pick heights with everything set at Top/Top/Top. If I do this, how will MC know to post A rotations? Or, to save time, just leave it as is and set each face with it's own work offset?
Yea Ron, I want 1 offset to run at COR. When I changed everything to TOP, the code looks good relative to COR. In what instance would I use TOP=TOP T/C= named plane? Is the point of creating a plane at each face to get the rotation code?
Hey guys, I have an electronics enclosure 6.00 x 7.00 with cutouts on all sides. I have it setup on the indexer, with center of rotation in Z @ TOP and the part surface is @ the "4 cutouts" plane. My output Z zero keeps going to COR. I included a sample file which shows just 1 side. I have 4 sides programmed already and I know the A-axis output works, and even shows perfect in verify. Is it best to program all my heights INC when doing rotary work?
4th sample.mcx-9
Hey Ron, well I got it to work and update my offset. No production here, just 3 electronic boxes, but I just wanted to practice probing and to save my self some indicating. I loaded my part onto pins at A0, ran an indicator across to align it, and set A0. I ran the probing cycle and it made an update of .004 degrees. I ran the indicator end to end again and it moved somewhere with a .0001 hashline Works for me!
I've seen other probe cycles online where the probe moves to position in Y+, the part rotates until it hits, the probe them moves in Y-, probe takes another hit and then sets zero at the flat. Is this a custom cycle or another MTB's?
Thanks for replyin Zoob. I totally missed the A0 position in the pic. So in my case, I would leave A at "A0", and run 9818. I don't see any A moves in the example, are those in the actual macro?
Hey Guys, I have a 4th axis part I want to automate setting the flat. I'm a bit confoozed. In the Renishaw Inspection Plus PDF, pg 9-9, why does the example rotate the part 45 degrees before any probing is done. If I have my part on a fixture which holds the flat parallel to the table, can I bring the probe in, move in Y3.0, hit, move Y-3.0 hit and update S2? Can I get some clarification?
TIA
Oh this on a Haas VF2 SSYT, HA5CB
I'm looking for toe clamps to hold down the said vise. I can't find them on Kurts website or MSC. I found these from Glacern in a search, but I was wondering if there is an official Kurt part #.
Boss doesn't want me to make them, so here I am.
eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.
Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.