New Quadro 2000

[Thee Rickster ™]

I wish I got the 4000.

 

Slow on big files just like the fx1500(not as slow ...but slow)....

[gcode]

I'm running a Quadro FX-4800 and it does really well.

Codebreaker's machine is a year newer and has the Quadro 4000

and really rocks.... and its half the price of an FX4800 too.

[Patrick Chelli]

Reko which driver version are you running?

[Patrick Chelli]

some images of the issue

[George Hardwick]

Nvidia Quadro 2000.

2 weeks ago, used install CD for coffee cup, and downloaded latest drivers.

Very pleased. No issues.

 

X

[Dan@home]

I hear the 4000 runs really hot. My 2000Ds' are to new to really give a thumbs up, but so far so good. I bought the 2000D because of the two DVI outputs on each, so I don't have allot of extra wires. Good for running two monitors.

[Reko]

Reko which driver version are you running?

 

Patrick,

 

Driver Provider: NVIDEA

Driver Date: 12/27/2010

Driver Version: 8.17.12.6645

 

HTH

[Oscar R.]

I'm running the 2000 in my new rig. About 2 months old. Seems to do well in verify, 5 axis, even shaded.

Although I am having similar images issues that Patrick described. Mostly in the dialog boxes. Also at least once or twice a day the end selection button and the undo buttons go grey. They still work if clicked on, just greyed out. Have to restart for them to show as selectable.

[Patrick Chelli]

yeah i have tried everything about 5 different drivers and different resolutions setting but nothing is working any other ideas?

[Patrick Chelli]

Turns out it was a DPI issue i had my DPI set to Smaller 100% but should be set to Medium(default) 125%

[jeff]

I'd be very curious to see how the GTX460 or GTX 570 compares to the Quadro 2000.

You don't happen to have one of those to swap out and compare them do you?

Maybe a file with a ton of solids and surfaces and rotate them or whatever?

 

Reason I'm asking is I'll be getting a new work pc soon, and I'm undecided on which card to use, budget is an issue.

I'm leaning toward the GTX500 series or the Quadro 2000.

[Patrick Chelli]

no sorry cant say i have used either GTX 460 or GTX 570. How big of file size are we talking about? i could do some testing and give you some feed back on the 2000.

[Dan@home]

I had two GTX 560 before these (2) quadro 2000Ds'. The GTX 560 did the job actually better than I thought they would. They lacked the shading quality and shine like you would see in solid works, and you would see flashes of white in mastercam when openning other programs. Witch I could live with. I am keepiing the two 560s' for back up.

[Patrick Chelli]

I found another laptop running a GTX 460 and for larger files i found the Quadro 2000 did run a little smoother then the GTX 460 but still better then i expected.

[jeff]

I had two GTX 560 before these (2) quadro 2000Ds'. The GTX 560 did the job actually better than I thought they would. They lacked the shading quality and shine like you would see in solid works, and you would see flashes of white in mastercam when openning other programs. Witch I could live with. I am keepiing the two 560s' for back up.

 

If you're running SLI, does your motherboard have 2x pci-e 16? or does it run them at 8x?

that makes all the difference in the world right there.

[Dan@home]

No jeff, I am not running SLI. I am running 4 momitors. So far I am liking the 2000D.

[JBowman]

I'd be very curious to see how the GTX460 or GTX 570 compares to the Quadro 2000.

I tried this with a GTX 560Ti and the 2000 was about the same but didnt flicker so Im sticking with the Quadro.

 

My post on the 560