Jump to content

Welcome to eMastercam

Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Use your display name or email address to sign in:

GoetzInd

Verified Members
  • Posts

    1,392
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by GoetzInd

  1. I use lines and it works pretty well. Mike
  2. Like Ron said, set up probing to ensure correct loading. Set up tool load monitoring as well. It will work well on tools of that size. Mike
  3. Yes. Look ahead can screw things up big time in Macros. I'm always throwing in G53's or G4's to block "pre-reading". Mike
  4. Yes. Mill a truncated thread start "Higby". This is often required here. Mike
  5. Yes. Planes have become unstable the last few version IMO. Mike
  6. Haha I always knew you could create planes with lines, just not that they would remain associative after moving/rotating. Mike
  7. Thanks G! This is very helpful. I was not aware planes maintained associativity to lines in this way. I have always only used points and then did incremental rotations. I think this will be a big time saver going forward. Mike
  8. My workflow is the same as GMS1. I create a point and associate the planes with it so that it moves whenever the geometry moves. This has worked well as long as I can remember until 2020. Files migrated in from previous versions still maintained associativity but new parts would not allow it. This is a huge PITA on parts with a lot of planes where we need to move things around for different machines, workholding etc. All in all planes reliability took a big step backward in 2020 as we have seen some very weird behavior. I'd be scared to death if we didn't have Vericut. Good to hear associativity is fixed. One thing that was discussed while I was at CNC software years ago was creating a wireframe entity that was similar to a genome that could be tied to a plane. That way you could dimply move it around with dynamic xform or whatever and change the location, angle more easily. I'd love to see this. Thanks, Mike
  9. Can anyone confirm that you can make planes associative to geometry again in 2021? Thanks, Mike
  10. I do what Gcode does unless I specifically need associativity. Way faster and more control. MIke
  11. This is what I find is necessary in Inconel. Mike
  12. Has there been any progress on this? As far as I can tell, there is not a way to make a plane associative to a point in 2020. Files that come in from 2019 work fine. I've found the plane manager to be very buggy in 2020. Even flip flopping planes on occasion. I'd be scared to death if we didn't have Vericut. Mike
  13. Code meter is the way to go. Been far more reliable and more responsive then nethasp. Mike
  14. Thanks Matt! That should come in handy. MIke
  15. Ended up re-installing the driver and that worked. Out of curiosity, how do you turn it on off? Thanks!
  16. Hey Guys, After a recent re-start, all of my Space Pilot Pro buttons are no longer working in Mastercam. Everything works in solidworks and other softwares but no dice in 2019 and 2020. Motion controller works though. Tried re-loading a backup copy of .workspace but still nothing. Went through the keyboard shortcuts in MC and 3D connexion and everything matches up. Any ideas? Thanks, Mike
  17. Thanks Zaffin, That's kinda what I was realizing. MIke
  18. Unfortunately, still hanging up on axis sub ops in 2020. Mike
  19. Excellent. I'll check it out and give it a try! MIke
  20. Very interesting... The thing is though, it isn't endless. I've posted these files out overnight and they work. Eventually.... Thanks! Mike

Join us!

eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.

Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...