Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Use your display name or email address to sign in:
WE DID! Have not heard anything after almost 2 weeks. Sent them a zip2fkinggo with one file that had a corrupt path. Never heard back from them. It was a file with about 40 processes (at that time) that would crash the simulator. When we tried posting it out it locked up with errors and a shtload of $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$'s. I was able to figure out the problem area after about an hour after we sent the file to MC and get that specific process working. I don't have time to babysit the fckedup children at MC. I told my boss before this 5x project started that MC could not handle it. They are probably too busy making new bugs and designing prettier icons. Will the new icons be pastel or earth tones? Can't wait for 2021 to see!!!!!!!!!
We are also having MANY 5-axis problems with 2020. Swarf and curve ripping right through the part. Simulations shows a perfect path. It seems if we try to make a full loop everything goes haywire. So, I have to break up everything into sections. It is a massive headache. No support from our vendor. To make matters worse, when we try to use a new model 2020 refuses to let go of the old model. Paths have to be completely regenerated. STILL no support from our vendor.
Yeah, that's not the issue. I never have that "feature" checked. That "feature" reminds me of another "feature" they had years ago called "use default post". Boy was that a FKUP. They tool that out soon after.
That bug exists in several other places in MC, too. In lathe if I change the tool number it creates quite a mess. I literally have to go in and create a whole new tool in order for the tool to post right. Many times I have to totally recreate ops in mill in order for it to take a change.
Yup. He says he is milling .3doc. He does not say if he is actually going deeper than .3. Many people think using a bigger endmill miraculously gives them better performance. It does not. It just costs a lot more. If I was only going .3 deep I would choose 1/4 - 3/8 endmill. 1/4 would actually do just fine. I assume he is only cutting .3 deep because nobody in there right mind would only use .3" of flute on a .75 endmill. Dynamilling with a .75dia endmill should be upto 3xD in D2 material with these tools.
Drafting color is controlled by the wireframe color. Create a template with a viewsheet for drafting and then define the viewsheets wireframe color with the attributes manager. Then save the template.
Okuma does have the best lathes. Their canned cycles are outstanding. Not as quick to program as a Mazak but still very fast with a cimco editor. One day I programmed and setup and ran 9 jobs on a mazak doing header tooling out of various tool steels. I have absolutely no idea why people by fanuc or haas lathes. They are absolute junk. The haas mill controls are great, except for 1 thing. Every new version they change everything around for no reason. The probing cycles are great for beginners. In 5 minutes they (most) have a good idea on how to get it running.
Most job shops in Chicago have a standard setup. Mazak lathes and Haas mills. It makes it much easier to find help that way. No wonder Chicago has a grip on every genre of machining.
eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.
Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.