Register now to participate in the forums, access the download area, buy Mastercam training materials, post processors and more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Use your display name or email address to sign in:
Sorry I'm late to the party. We do 6Al4V bone plates on the trunnion on the Haas. I've been using Helical and Harvey cutters with good results. Dynamic roughing with a 1/2" x 1.25" 7 flute .030" radius bull (27287) and Helical's recommended parameters i get five hours of tool life, in a shrink fit holder with 1000PSI TSC. I got some Kennametal Harvi 3's and some of Helical's new Ti specific cutters but haven't had a chance to try them yet, didn't want to change the proven process in production.
I haven't used a materials library in over a decade. I use HSMAdvisor and the Helical Machining Advisor, and adjust parameters for each cut (except drills and reamers). Makes for a far more efficient program.
Am I going to have to do that with every function I ever want to access quickly? And no, it's not like in the old days, it's much slower to move the mouse cursor and click on an icon than to quickly tap a couple keys. Looks like this one has a default hotkey assigned, that'll help with this specific case, but I imagine overall most functions will be significantly slower to access.
Sorry if I'm coming across as bitchy, I just find this really painful.
Ok, found that access keys can be enabled in settings, but are off by default. That's strange. So noe I can hit <Alt> <F>ile <O>pen, but then I have to switch to the mouse and click (Computer), (Browse). Not much faster.
Downloaded and installed, figured I'd bite the bullet and learn the new interface. Turns out access keys don't work at all now. I have to click with the mouse four times before I can browse for a file to open (File, Open, Computer, Browse). In X9 I can hit <Alt> <F>ile <O>pen in 1/4 second to get there. This is going to be painful.
Don't get too caught up on how much memory a video card has. If it has enough, it has enough, and more won't make it faster. I've seen some benchmarks where two otherwise identical cards are compared and the one with less memory is a bit faster since it has less overhead.
For most applications you should get good results from a medium to high end GeForce, more demanding applications will require a medium to high end Quadro. Mastercam historically has not played well with AMD video cards. CPU performance per thread is the biggest factor (Xeons often sacrifice that for thread count), and make sure you have plenty of fast RAM.
The amount of video memory you'll need depends on how many pixels you want it to drive. For four 4k screens you'll need a lot more than for two 2k screens.
Desktop beats laptop unless you absolutely need the portability. Geforce cards are find until you get into big, complicated models, or unless you need Solidworks simulation functions. I pick my CPU based on this list:
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html
An SSD and plenty of RAM (probably 64GB these days) make a big difference.
I have two shortcuts on my desktop:
Stop:
"C:\Program Files\3Dconnexion\3DxWare\3DxWinCore64\3DxService.exe" -quiet -shutdown
Start:
"C:\Program Files\3Dconnexion\3DxWare\3DxWinCore64\3DxService.exe"
If the driver is ever acting up, working on SW but not MC for example, I hit "stop", wait 30 seconds, and hit "start".
Drawing on center will get you close, but if you need exact you need to know the k-factor. Most materials will not stretch and compress equally on both sides of the centerline; many will stretch easier than they compress, so the bend line is off center.
https://www.javelin-tech.com/blog/2017/06/calculating-bend-allowance/
eMastercam - your online source for all things Mastercam.
Together, we are the strongest Mastercam community on the web with over 56,000 members, and our online store offers a wide selection of training materials for all applications and skill levels.