Thanks Doug. The manual you sent is for that exact model (GS250 MSY), so that will be an immense help. They sure seem to be programmed a little differently

Thanks Greg. I'll test it on the machine. Me, I much prefer a G140/G141

Hi there, Has anyone here programmed a Hardinge Fanuc 18i sub spindle lathe? If so, how is the sub spindle origin defined, and how is this programmed in Mastercam? Also, is Z+ away from the sub spindle, or towards it? I'm trying to assist a customer, and the machine supplier isn't being much help

Face interpolation? You mean coordinate conversion function? (G101/102/103)? Where have you been?

I swear that MC must have a set number of features, and when they add something new, they have to take something else away to make room It seems to get worse with every release

Aint that the truth. Right now, Tim and I would be having a great chuckle about a couple of things that have occurred. It is in threads like this, and times like this, that I really miss his input.

Thanks for the reply. Yes, that is correct they'e index only. 5 degree index standard, and 1 degree index as an option. I believe the customer considers the 5 degree option to be suitable enough. I'd personally opt for the 1 deg, but I think it comes down to budget. You programme yours in standard g-code, correct?

Does anyone have any feedback on these machines? Good/Bad/Otherwise? I have a customer considering one, and I really know zilch about Mazaks.

I'll throw my hat in the ring, but the disclaimer is, I am a Vericut reseller. I totally agree with those opinions of Jon Prun. Jon is one of the most honest, unassuming owners I have ever met in the CAE world. I've met a few (some well known ones), and Jon really stands out. As for the product, Vericut didn't get where it is today by not being good. All software has its pro's and cons. Just look at CAM software. Service and support go a long way, and stand out way longer after the taste of a good price has gone. All those things have to be considered. I'd check out all the products, and use your local support. It is all good to have it demoed to you by a principal miles away, but it is when push comes to shove and you need someone to help quickly, that the support shows through. That often comes up in conversation from my customers (in all CAD/CAM/CAE products) *Edit* Sorry, I mis-read the topic. I thought you were considering NC simulation in general. I'll be quiet LOL

You're in good hands with Postability. Dave and his team rock

We have Cimco DNC Max, and the DNC server emails me whenever a file is sent back to the server from the CNC machine. Cimco can utilise a trigger to send an email where necessary. Your local reseller should be able to help you out there.

Triple post Aaron? Thanks for all the input everyone. It seems to me that a mixture of sitting and standing makes a lot of sense. Our local supplier has a suitable electric sitting/standing desk, so I think I'll plonk for one of them. I'll provide some feedback when it happens

Yes, I'm leaning (no pun intended) to an adjustable desk, one that electrically raises and lowers, so I can vary the position during the day. The general consensus seems to be one of sitting and standing variably.

Haha, yes, that I do know you. At least you have a workaround. Some users of whatever software don't have the luxury of having a workaround. One company I have dealt with, actually sends out bugfixes and enhancements to post processors. No secret squirrel, member of the club access to get those. That, I like...

Ok, so I'm not sure where this would go, so please don't flame my poison ivy a** I'm curious who here uses a standing vs sitting desk. Or a desk that does both. I've read all sides of the stories, and I'm keen to see some kind of feedback here. I'm about to fit out a new office, and I have to start sorting furniture

Well, one company I deal with sends out fixes about once a week, maybe every second week, but those fixes typically include one or more enhancements. I can live with that. But, if you have a bug that is holding you up, and isn't being fixed, well, yes... That is a test of patience. No workaround provided?

I think most of us here accept that there is no bug free engineering software. It's how those software companies handle those bugs that is more important. And we all typically use the various software in different ways, so some of us find bugs that others don't.

I had an NC file once that was 210mb, and that was without line numbers. It was a huge wax die, that almost filled the table of the machine, with lots of fine detail. I pushed the button at 4pm on a Friday, and came in on Monday morning, and it was all done, with no issues. I sure felt relieved.

Ok, that is a big chunk of stock to barfeed I'm only used to smaller diameters

What size bar are you looking at running? We have an Okuma U3000-1500 2SW (Twin spindle, twin turret). Its a great machine. Can't give you feedback on the post, as we use TopSolid for that machine.

You know more than me. I was told August, but then, ah well I did just get notification from my MC reseller that 2018 has been released though! LOL

Yes, it is a prerelease

Vericut 8.1 does have some new features, but it isn't scheduled for release until August I believe

I received a V804 prelease of the MC 2018 plug in this morning, so it looks like it is a work in progress.

Try running it with a generic bullnose cutter (ie, a 2.5" diameter radius corner endmill) and see if you get the same error. I would expect it is something to do with the DXF input.