Nope and a method to add more than one group at a time with custom naming along with sequential controls. These have been suggestion and numbers assigned over the years and nothing yet. I did have a Chook I used a couple versions back, but it has not been updated so only works in 2021

IT will have to be recompiled for the 2024 version. That zip was for a previous version of the Software.

I make them separate view sheets normally, but an automated way to output them not sure of one.

Not a way through Active reports since this is not really tracked that way. Best way is to build them and then make screen shots you add to your setup sheets.

You made sure this not checked? VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV VVVVVVVVVVVVVV VVVVVVVVVVV VVVVVVV VVVV V

Trim to plane and split solid is checked. I normally uncheck Make associative to plane to not get issues when deleting un-needed plans in the planes manager. 5 seconds of work answer both of your questions?

Can I ask a dumb question here? Why not use a 1/8 stub flute ball endmill if you are worried about rigidity? Use the bull in the floor, but use a smaller tool. Why are you trying to use in essence a size on size tool for such a feature? Back up and approach this differently and you will reduce run time and improve the quality of the work. Really want to be trick get a .375 endmill with a .062R made on it and plunge in one shot dwell after roughing with a .005 smaller tool.

Fringe users will be what we are just on the fringe. We will always fall through the cracks since the main stream make it simple stupid and hold the hands of new programmers will always take priority in the software development.

Pros big screen space. Cons Big screen space with no real division of what is what. I have 3 27" Asus flat monitors and have mt method and process down using them. Going to curved would be hard. The other thing is screen sharing using Teams or something else it sucks for the other people to see the curved screen.

[email protected] would be your best bet.

It been requested numerous times over the years. Join the Mastercam.com forum and send an email to QC and add your name to the list.

That is just crazy I tell you. Crazy talk.

Done it many times over the years with Mastercam. Kalibre pointed you in a good direction. I made models for everything and used them in my setup sheets to help anyone running one of my programs understand when where and how I wanted things done.

Having G68.2 all the time is not a big deal. Biggest thing is understanding do you want the canned cycles to be supported in all 3+2 operations? Do you want the machine to track the fixture offset through all 3+2 work right next to G43.4 and then have G54.4 for error correcting as needed?